COMPARE AND CONTRAST AMBROSE BRIECE AND WASHINGTON IRVING

In my opinion I like Ambrose's writings a lot more then Washington Irving's. Ambrose wrote in moving and explicit detail that helped explain what was going through his protagonists head. This let me emphasize with him  On the other hand Washington Irving put immense detail into his surroundings and explaining what everything looked like instead of developing his character in a way that makes him understandable by the readers. I think that most likely Washington did not want the readers to like his protagonist and thus made the writing like that on purpose, however in my opinion by doing so he made his writing rather boring and drab.

THINKING QUESTIONNNNNNNNNNN!!!!!!!

Why do you think the author chose that ending for his writing? What was the purpose of the ending?

An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge Chapter 3 first passage

"As Peyton Farquhar fell straight downward through the bridge he lost consciousness and was as one already dead. From this state he was awakened--ages later, it seemed to him--by the pain of a sharp pressure upon his throat, followed by a sense of suffocation. Keen, poignant agonies seemed to shoot from his neck downward through every fiber of his body and limbs. These pains appeared to flash along well-defined lines of ramification and to beat with an inconceivably rapid periodicity. They seemed like streams of pulsating fire heating him to an intolerable temperature. As to his head, he was conscious of nothing but a feeling of fulness--of congestion. These sensations were unaccompanied by thought. The intellectual part of his nature was already effaced; he had power only to feel, and feeling was torment. He was conscious of motion. Encompassed in a luminous cloud, of which he was now merely the fiery heart, without material substance, he swung through unthinkable arcs of oscillation, like a vast pendulum. Then all at once, with terrible suddenness, the light about him shot upward with the noise of a loud splash; a frightful roaring was in his ears, and all was cold and dark. The power of thought was restored; he knew that the rope had broken and he had fallen into the stream. There was no additional strangulation; the noose about his neck was already suffocating him and kept the water from his lungs. To die of hanging at the bottom of a river!--the idea seemed to him ludicrous. He opened his eyes in the darkness and saw above him a gleam of light, but how distant, how inaccessible! He was still sinking, for the light became fainter and fainter until it was a mere glimmer. Then it began to grow and brighten, and he knew that he was rising toward the surface--knew it with reluctance, for he was now very comfortable. "To be hanged and drowned," he thought? "that is not so bad; but I do not wish to be shot. No; I will not be shot; that is not fair.""

The beginning of this passage shows the protagonist being hanged and then falling into a river after the rope breaks. I love the description of his oxygen deprived mind, this passage shows the confusion and chaos that is going in Peyton's mind as he falls into this creek, the pressure on his throat from the noose, the pain in his hands, the suffocation of being underwater. All of this is expressed in beautiful detail.

The end of this passage shows his renewed determination to live, however the part i find very intriguing is the reason for why he wanted to live. The author portrays the character as noble and kind but in the end his drive to live did not come from that root but instead seemed to come from what he thought was an okay death versus what wasn't. He wanted to die hanging over being shot, which i find to be somewhat absurd but also wholesomely amusing. I think that this passage may show a side to the character that is not necessarily shown in the rest of the writing.

the power of twin awesomness

WE ARE SUPER COOL